Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8vsBMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M6 (E63)
5.0 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lightest1,685 kg3,715 lb
- Best power-to-weight301 hp/t224 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best practicality score53/100
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.8 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range473 km294 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best economy score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 520Nm384lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 1,995kg4,398lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 57.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s | 15.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.3L/100 km10.1mpg US12.1mpg UK | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 301hp/t224kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated | 296hp/t221kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 405km252mi Calculated | 473km294mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 4,999cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,657mm183in | 4,871mm192in |
| Width | 1,833mm72in | 1,855mm73in |
| Height | 1,365mm54in | 1,372mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,781mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,584mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 7,750 rpm | 6,100 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 15.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 4.3 s |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 and BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 405 km 252 mi |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 473 km 294 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 |
| 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 |
| 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK |
| BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | BMWM6 (E63)5.0 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | 14.8 L/100 km 15.9 mpg US 19.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 405 km 252 mi | 473 km 294 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 296 hp/t 221 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK | 14.8 L/100 km15.9 mpg US19.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.78 LC100 km | 25.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.09 LC100 mi | 41.68 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,295 L606 US gal505 UK gal | 2,220 L586 US gal488 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,016 LC/year | 3,885 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW M6 (E63) 5.0 V10
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























