BMW M5 (F90 LCI) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) · Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8vsYangwang U7 2.0T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonYangwang U7
2.0T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Yangwang U7 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Most powerful1,306 hp974 kW
- Highest torque1,680 Nm1,239 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight405 hp/t302 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Best practicality score73/100
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted305 km/h190 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,825 kg4,023 lb
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | YangwangU72.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 1,306hp974kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 1,680Nm1,239lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 3,223kg7,105lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 3,598kg7,932lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.8s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 26.3s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.3s | 7.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 348hp/t259kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated | 405hp/t302kW/t184hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 411Nm/t275lb-ft/ton Calculated | 521Nm/t349lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 602km374mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,001mm197in | 5,360mm211in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,982mm117in | 3,200mm126in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | YangwangU72.0T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.3 s | 7.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph Limited | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 10.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 128 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| YangwangU72.0T | 1,306 hp 974 kW |
Yangwang U7 2.0T has 671 hp more than BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8 and Yangwang U7 2.0T: 671 hp (500 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| YangwangU72.0T | 1,680 Nm 1,239 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
| YangwangU72.0T | 3,223 kg 7,105 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph |
| YangwangU72.0T | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 3.0 s |
| YangwangU72.0T | 2.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Yangwang U7 2.0T and BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| YangwangU72.0T | 405 hp/t 302 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph |
| YangwangU72.0T | 1,306 hp 974 kW | 2.9 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| YangwangU72.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | YangwangU72.0T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 1,306 hp 974 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 1,680 Nm 1,239 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | 3,223 kg 7,105 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 602 km 374 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 405 hp/t 302 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8
- Is 1,398 kg lighter
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Yangwang U7 2.0T
- Has 671 hp more
- Has 930 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 57 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























