BMW M5 (F90 LCI) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) · Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8vsBMW M5 (E34) 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M5 (E34)
3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted305 km/h190 mph Restricted
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight348 hp/t259 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score94/100
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.8s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 59.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.3s | 17.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 348hp/t259kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 411Nm/t275lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 602km374mi Calculated | 938km583mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 3,795cc232cu in |
| Length | 5,001mm197in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,751mm69in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,982mm117in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,474mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,496mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 460L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M5 (E34) 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,950 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 6,900 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.3 s | 17.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 128 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 340 hp 254 kW |
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8 has 295 hp more than BMW M5 (E34) 3.8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 and BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8: 295 hp (220 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 3.0 s |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8 and BMW M5 (E34) 3.8: 2.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 and BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 602 km 374 mi |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 938 km 583 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 602 km 374 mi | 938 km 583 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8 | BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8
- Has 295 hp more
- Has 350 Nm more
- Is 2.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 55 km/h (34 mph) higher top speed
- Has 142 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 336 km (209 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























