BMW M5 (F90 LCI) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) · Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8vsBMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 (G80)
CS 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted305 km/h190 mph Restricted
- Most powerful635 hp474 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight348 hp/t259 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range602 km374 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score94/100
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 635hp474kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,825kg4,023lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,245kg4,949lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.8s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.3s | 11.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 348hp/t259kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated | 312hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 411Nm/t275lb-ft/ton Calculated | 368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 602km374mi Calculated | 567km353mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 5,001mm197in | 4,795mm189in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,918mm76in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,982mm117in | 2,857mm112in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | 123mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,950 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 6,250 rpm | 2,750-5,950 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.3 s | 11.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph Limited | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.0 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 128 mph | 202 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW |
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8 has 85 hp more than BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8: 85 hp (63 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 3.0 s |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 3.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8 and BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 602 km 374 mi |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 567 km 353 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 635 hp 474 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8 | BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 635 hp 474 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 305 km/h190 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 302 km/h188 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 602 km 374 mi | 567 km 353 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 312 hp/t 232 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8 | BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (F90 LCI) Facelift 2020 CS 4.4 V8
- Has 85 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























