BMW M3 (E36)
Car comparison
BMW M3 (E36) 3.2vsBMW M5 (E34) 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M5 (E34)
3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 (E36) 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score76/100
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 321hp239kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 59.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 17.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 564km350mi Calculated | 938km583mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,201cc195cu in | 3,795cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,696mm67in | 1,751mm69in |
| Height | 1,365mm54in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,710mm107in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,422mm56in | 1,474mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,438mm57in | 1,496mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 460L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
- BMW M5 (E34) 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 6,900 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 17.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 113 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 340 hp 254 kW |
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 has 19 hp more than BMW M3 (E36) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 and BMW M5 (E34) 3.8: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 5.5 s |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 5.9 s |
Although BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 has more power, BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 and BMW M5 (E34) 3.8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 and BMW M3 (E36) 3.2: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 564 km 350 mi |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 938 km 583 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 (E36)3.2 | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 321 hp 239 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 564 km 350 mi | 938 km 583 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 (E36) 3.2 | BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.25 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,888 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 (E36) 3.2
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 374 km (232 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























