BMW M5 (E39)
Car comparison
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8vsBMW M5 (E34) 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M5 (E34)
3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best practicality score74/100
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.0 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 59.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 17.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 206hp/t154kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 504km313mi Calculated | 938km583mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,941cc302cu in | 3,795cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,751mm69in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,392mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,830mm111in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,474mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,496mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 460L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M5 (E34) 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 6,600 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 6,900 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 17.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 340 hp 254 kW |
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 has 60 hp more than BMW M5 (E34) 3.8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 and BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 5.3 s |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 and BMW M5 (E34) 3.8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 and BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8: 4.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 504 km 313 mi |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 938 km 583 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | BMWM5 (E34)3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 504 km 313 mi | 938 km 583 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 206 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 | BMW M5 (E34) 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW M5 (E34) 3.8
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 434 km (270 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























