BMW M5 (E39)
Car comparison
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8vsBMW 7 Series (E38) · Facelift 1998 750i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 7 Series (E38) · Facelift 1998
750i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score70/100
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption19.6 L/100 km12.0 mpg US14.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range699 km434 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 326hp243kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 490Nm361lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,495kg5,501lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 71.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 21.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 504km313mi Calculated | 699km434mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,941cc302cu in | 5,379cc328cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,984mm196in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,862mm73in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,830mm111in | 2,930mm115in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,568mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 6,600 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 5,000 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 21.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 326 hp 243 kW |
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 has 74 hp more than BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i and BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8: 74 hp (55 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 5.3 s |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 and BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 13.6 L/100 km 17.3 mpg US 20.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 504 km 313 mi |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 699 km 434 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 326 hp 243 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i |
| 13.6 L/100 km 17.3 mpg US 20.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 13.6 L/100 km 17.3 mpg US 20.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 13.6 L/100 km 17.3 mpg US 20.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | BMW7 Series (E38)Facelift 1998750i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 326 hp 243 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,960 kg 4,321 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 13.6 L/100 km 17.3 mpg US 20.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 504 km 313 mi | 699 km 434 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 | BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 23.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 38.30 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 2,040 L539 US gal449 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 3,570 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8
- Has 74 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 7 Series (E38) Facelift 1998 750i
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 195 km (121 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























