BMW M5 (F90)
Car comparison
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8vsBMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M5 (E39)
4.9 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful600 hp447 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight323 hp/t241 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range648 km402 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score77/100
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,290kg5,049lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 40.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 51.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s | 15.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 323hp/t241kW/t147hp/1000 lb Calculated | 233hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 404Nm/t271lb-ft/ton Calculated | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 648km402mi Calculated | 504km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,941cc302cu in |
| Length | 4,966mm196in | 4,784mm188in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,473mm58in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,982mm117in | 2,830mm111in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,527mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 460L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 241g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 5,600-6,700 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 6,600 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 15.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 201 km/h 125 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 400 hp 298 kW |
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 has 200 hp more than BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 and BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8: 200 hp (149 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 3.4 s |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 and BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8: 1.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 and BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 648 km 402 mi |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 504 km 313 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 648 km 402 mi | 504 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 241 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 | BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 24.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 3,649 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8
- Has 200 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 1.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 91 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 144 km (89 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8
- Is 135 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























