BMW M5 (F90)
Car comparison
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8vsBMW M5 (E28) 3.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M5 (E28)
3.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful600 hp447 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight323 hp/t241 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score79/100
BMW M5 (E28) 3.5
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best practicality score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E28)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,855kg4,090lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 40.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 57.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s | 21.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 323hp/t241kW/t147hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 404Nm/t271lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 648km402mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 3,453cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,966mm196in | 4,620mm182in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,700mm67in |
| Height | 1,473mm58in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,982mm117in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,430mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,465mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 640L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 241g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M5 (E28) 3.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 5,600-6,700 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E28)3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 21.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 201 km/h 125 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 286 hp 213 kW |
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 has 314 hp more than BMW M5 (E28) 3.5.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (E28) 3.5 and BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8: 314 hp (234 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 3.4 s |
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 and BMW M5 (E28) 3.5: 3.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | 286 hp 213 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM5 (E28)3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (E28)3.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 648 km 402 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 241 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8
- Has 314 hp more
- Has 410 Nm more
- Is 3.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 123 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M5 (E28) 3.5
- Is 425 kg lighter
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























