BMW M5 (E39)
Car comparison
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8vsBMW 7 Series (E65) 760i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 7 Series (E65)
760i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 7 Series (E65) 760i
- Most powerful445 hp332 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption20.2 L/100 km11.6 mpg US14.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range657 km408 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best economy score71/100
- Best practicality score76/100
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | BMW7 Series (E65)760i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 445hp332kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,630kg5,798lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 55.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK | 20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 504km313mi Calculated | 657km408mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,941cc302cu in | 5,972cc364cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 5,029mm198in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,492mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,830mm111in | 2,990mm118in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 88L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW 7 Series (E65) 760i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 6,600 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 6,000 rpm | 3,950 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | BMW7 Series (E65)760i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 16.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 445 hp 332 kW |
BMW 7 Series (E65) 760i has 45 hp more than BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 and BMW 7 Series (E65) 760i: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 2,015 kg 4,442 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 5.3 s |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 5.5 s |
Although BMW 7 Series (E65) 760i has more power, BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 and BMW 7 Series (E65) 760i: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 7 Series (E65) 760i and BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 504 km 313 mi |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 657 km 408 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 445 hp 332 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i |
| 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 7 Series (E65) 760i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMW7 Series (E65)760i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM5 (E39)4.9 V8 | BMW7 Series (E65)760i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 445 hp 332 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 2,015 kg 4,442 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 504 km 313 mi | 657 km 408 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8 | BMW 7 Series (E65) 760i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 23.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 3,518 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M5 (E39) 4.9 V8
- Is 295 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW 7 Series (E65) 760i
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 153 km (95 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























