Car comparison

BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0vsYangwang U7 2.0T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M3 (G80)

CS 3.0

550 hp2993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2023-2024
VS

Yangwang U7

2.0T

1306 hp1999 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2025-2026

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0

  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph Unrestricted
    302 km/h
    188 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,765 kg
    3,891 lb
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    90/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Yangwang U7 2.0T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.9 s
  • Most powerful
    1,306 hp
    974 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,680 Nm
    1,239 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    405 hp/t
    302 kW/t
    2.5 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0YangwangU72.0T
Power
550hp410kW
1,306hp974kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
1,680Nm1,239lb-ft
Curb weight
1,765kg3,891lb
3,223kg7,105lb
Gross weight
2,245kg4,949lb
3,598kg7,932lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.8s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
26.3s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
2.9s
0-200 km/h
11.1s
7.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.2s
Calculated
2.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
312hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb
Calculated
405hp/t302kW/t184hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton
Calculated
521Nm/t349lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
567km353mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,795mm189in
5,360mm211in
Width
1,918mm76in
2,000mm79in
Height
1,438mm57in
1,515mm60in
Wheelbase
2,857mm112in
3,200mm126in
Front track
1,623mm64in
-
Rear track
1,605mm63in
-
Ground clearance
123mm5in
150mm6in
Trunk volume
480L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
59L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0YangwangU72.0T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.2 s
2.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
2.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.1 s
7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
4.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
6.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.5 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
202 km/h
125 mph
231 km/h
144 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
550 hp
410 kW
YangwangU72.0T
1,306 hp
974 kW

Yangwang U7 2.0T has 756 hp more than BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 and Yangwang U7 2.0T: 756 hp (564 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
YangwangU72.0T
1,680 Nm
1,239 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
1,765 kg
3,891 lb
YangwangU72.0T
3,223 kg
7,105 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
YangwangU72.0T
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.03.4 s
YangwangU72.0T2.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Yangwang U7 2.0T and BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
312 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
YangwangU72.0T
405 hp/t
302 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
550 hp
410 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
YangwangU72.0T
1,306 hp
974 kW
2.9 s
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,795 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
YangwangU72.0T
Power
1,306 hp
974 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,360 mm
211.0 in
Height
1,515 mm
59.6 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0YangwangU72.0T
Power
550 hp
410 kW
1,306 hp
974 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
1,680 Nm
1,239 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
2.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
302 km/h188 mph
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
270 km/h168 mph
Lightness
1,765 kg
3,891 lb
3,223 kg
7,105 lb
Fuel consumption
10.4 L/100 km
22.6 mpg US
27.2 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
480 L
17.0 cu ft
Length
4,795 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,438 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,360 mm
211.0 in
Height
1,515 mm
59.6 in
Range score
567 km
353 mi
-
Trunk score
480 L
17.0 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
312 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
405 hp/t
302 kW/t
2.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
Consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.29 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,730 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0

  • Is 1,458 kg lighter
  • Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Yangwang U7 2.0T

  • Has 756 hp more
  • Has 1,030 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 94 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0
Yangwang U7 2.0T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

CS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 (G80 LCI)Facelift 2024Competition 3.0
2.0T
112 kWh
VS
YangwangU72.0TvsPolestar5112 kWh
CS 3.0
CS 3.0
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0
CS 3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 Touring (G81)Competition 3.0
2.0T
S 680 V8
VS
YangwangU72.0TvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)Facelift 2026S 680 V8
CS 3.0
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 (E90)4.0 V8
2.0T
Performance 79 kWh
VS
YangwangU72.0TvsTeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Performance 79 kWh
CS 3.0
3.2
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 (E36)3.2
2.0T
S 580 V8
VS
YangwangU72.0TvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)Facelift 2026S 580 V8
CS 3.0
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8
2.0T
M70 105.7 kWh
VS
YangwangU72.0TvsBMWi7 (G70)M70 105.7 kWh
CS 3.0
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0vsBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
BMW M3 (G80) CS 3.0 vs Yangwang U7 2.0T - car comparison - FastVsFaster