Yangwang U7
Car comparison
Yangwang U7 2.0TvsPolestar 5 112 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPolestar 5
112 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Yangwang U7 2.0T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful1,306 hp974 kW
- Highest torque1,680 Nm1,239 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight405 hp/t302 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Lightest2,503 kg5,518 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | YangwangU72.0T | Polestar5112 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,306hp974kW | 884hp659kW |
| Torque | 1,680Nm1,239lb-ft | 1,015Nm749lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 3,223kg7,105lb | 2,503kg5,518lb |
| Gross weight | 3,598kg7,932lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 26.3s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 26.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 3.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.6s Calculated | 8.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 3.1s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.2s Calculated | 10.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 405hp/t302kW/t184hp/1000 lb Calculated | 353hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 521Nm/t349lb-ft/ton Calculated | 406Nm/t271lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 5,360mm211in | 5,087mm200in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 2,015mm79in |
| Height | 1,515mm60in | 1,419mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,200mm126in | 3,054mm120in |
| Front track | - | 1,716mm68in |
| Rear track | - | 1,684mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,128L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | YangwangU72.0T | Polestar5112 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 3.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 3.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.6 s | 8.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 9.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.2 s | 10.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 231 km/h 144 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 1,306 hp 974 kW |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 884 hp 659 kW |
Yangwang U7 2.0T has 422 hp more than Polestar 5 112 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Polestar 5 112 kWh and Yangwang U7 2.0T: 422 hp (315 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 1,680 Nm 1,239 lb-ft |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 1,015 Nm 749 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 3,223 kg 7,105 lb |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 2,503 kg 5,518 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Polestar5112 kWh | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 2.9 s |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 3.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Yangwang U7 2.0T and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 405 hp/t 302 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 353 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T | 1,306 hp 974 kW | 2.9 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Polestar5112 kWh | 884 hp 659 kW | 3.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YangwangU72.0T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Polestar5112 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | YangwangU72.0T | Polestar5112 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,306 hp 974 kW | 884 hp 659 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,680 Nm 1,239 lb-ft | 1,015 Nm 749 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 3.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 3,223 kg 7,105 lb | 2,503 kg 5,518 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 405 hp/t 302 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 353 hp/t 263 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Yangwang U7 2.0T
- Has 422 hp more
- Has 665 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
Polestar 5 112 kWh
- Is 720 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























