BMW M4 (G82)
Car comparison
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0vsNIO EC6 II 75 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNIO EC6 II
75 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Best power-to-weight282 hp/t211 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score78/100
NIO EC6 II 75 kWh
- Most powerful490 hp365 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | NIOEC6 II75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480hp358kW | 490hp365kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 2,292kg5,053lb |
| Gross weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,826kg6,230lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 46.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.4s Calculated | 24.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 324Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 546km339mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,794mm189in | 4,849mm191in |
| Width | 1,887mm74in | 1,995mm79in |
| Height | 1,393mm55in | 1,697mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,915mm115in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,711mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,711mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,402L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | NIOEC6 II75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.4 s | 24.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
| NIOEC6 II75 kWh | 490 hp 365 kW |
NIO EC6 II 75 kWh has 10 hp more than BMW M4 (G82) 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 and NIO EC6 II 75 kWh: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| NIOEC6 II75 kWh | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| NIOEC6 II75 kWh | 2,292 kg 5,053 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NIOEC6 II75 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 4.2 s |
| NIOEC6 II75 kWh | 4.4 s |
Although NIO EC6 II 75 kWh has more power, BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 and NIO EC6 II 75 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| NIOEC6 II75 kWh | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NIOEC6 II75 kWh | 490 hp 365 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM4 (G82)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NIOEC6 II75 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM4 (G82)3.0 | NIOEC6 II75 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp 358 kW | 490 hp 365 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 2,292 kg 5,053 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 546 km 339 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M4 (G82) 3.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M4 (G82) 3.0
- Is 592 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 69 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
NIO EC6 II 75 kWh
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























