Car comparison

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWhvsNIO EC6 II 75 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Mustang Mach-E

GT 98.7 kWh

487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2022-2025
VS

NIO EC6 II

75 kWh

490 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2023-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    860 Nm
    634 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,276 kg
    5,018 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    214 hp/t
    160 kW/t
    4.7 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    78/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100

NIO EC6 II 75 kWh

  • Most powerful
    490 hp
    365 kW
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best practicality score
    71/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhNIOEC6 II75 kWh
Power
487hp363kW
490hp365kW
Torque
860Nm634lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,276kg5,018lb
2,292kg5,053lb
Gross weight
2,717kg5,990lb
2,826kg6,230lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
48.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
46.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
25.1s
Calculated
24.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Quarter mile
12.8s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton
Calculated
305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Length
4,743mm187in
4,849mm191in
Width
1,881mm74in
1,995mm79in
Height
1,613mm64in
1,697mm67in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,915mm115in
Front track
1,613mm64in
1,711mm67in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,711mm67in
Ground clearance
130mm5in
-
Trunk volume
402L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,420L
1,402L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhNIOEC6 II75 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.1 s
24.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.2 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
10.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.8 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
168 km/h
105 mph
169 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
490 hp
365 kW

NIO EC6 II 75 kWh has 3 hp more than Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh and NIO EC6 II 75 kWh: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
860 Nm
634 lb-ft
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
2,276 kg
5,018 lb
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
2,292 kg
5,053 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh4.4 s
NIOEC6 II75 kWh4.4 s

Although NIO EC6 II 75 kWh has more power, Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
214 hp/t
159 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
490 hp
365 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
487 hp
363 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
Power
490 hp
365 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,849 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhNIOEC6 II75 kWh
Power
487 hp
363 kW
490 hp
365 kW
Torque
860 Nm
634 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
2,276 kg
5,018 lb
2,292 kg
5,053 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,849 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in
Trunk score
402 L
14.2 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
214 hp/t
159 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

  • Has 160 Nm more
  • Is 16 kg lighter
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

NIO EC6 II 75 kWh

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 103 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
NIO EC6 II 75 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GT 98.7 kWh
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
75 kWh
GT 98.7 kWh
VS
NIOEC6 II75 kWhvsFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
GT 98.7 kWh
102 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsPolestar4102 kWh
75 kWh
GTS 4.0 V8
VS
NIOEC6 II75 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
S 95 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsAUDIe-tron SportbackS 95 kWh
75 kWh
3.0
VS
NIOEC6 II75 kWhvsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
GT 98.7 kWh
AMG CLE 53
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsMercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53
GT 98.7 kWh
3.0
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
75 kWh
X H550 2.0L
VS
NIOEC6 II75 kWhvsLotusEletreX H550 2.0L
GT 98.7 kWh
M50 83.9 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsBMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh
GT 98.7 kWh
3.0
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
GT 98.7 kWh
500 V8
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsLexusLC500 V8
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh vs NIO EC6 II 75 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster