Car comparison

Polestar 4 102 kWhvsNIO EC6 II 75 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Polestar 4

102 kWh

544 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2023-present
VS

NIO EC6 II

75 kWh

490 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2023-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Polestar 4 102 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    544 hp
    406 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    231 hp/t
    173 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best performance score
    79/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100

NIO EC6 II 75 kWh

  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,292 kg
    5,053 lb
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best practicality score
    71/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPolestar4102 kWhNIOEC6 II75 kWh
Power
544hp406kW
490hp365kW
Torque
686Nm506lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,351kg5,183lb
2,292kg5,053lb
Gross weight-
2,826kg6,230lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
41.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
46.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.8s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
21.5s
Calculated
24.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.6s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
231hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb
Calculated
214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Length
4,839mm191in
4,849mm191in
Width
2,139mm84in
1,995mm79in
Height
1,544mm61in
1,697mm67in
Wheelbase
2,999mm118in
2,915mm115in
Front track-
1,711mm67in
Rear track-
1,711mm67in
Ground clearance
166mm7in
-
Trunk volume
500L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,536L
1,402L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPolestar4102 kWhNIOEC6 II75 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.6 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.8 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.5 s
24.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
10.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
174 km/h
108 mph
169 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh
544 hp
406 kW
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
490 hp
365 kW

Polestar 4 102 kWh has 54 hp more than NIO EC6 II 75 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between NIO EC6 II 75 kWh and Polestar 4 102 kWh: 54 hp (40 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh
686 Nm
506 lb-ft
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh
2,351 kg
5,183 lb
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
2,292 kg
5,053 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh3.8 s
NIOEC6 II75 kWh4.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 4 102 kWh and NIO EC6 II 75 kWh: 0.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Polestar4102 kWh
231 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
214 hp/t
159 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Polestar4102 kWh
544 hp
406 kW
3.8 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
490 hp
365 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Polestar4102 kWh
Power
544 hp
406 kW
0-100 km/h3.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,839 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,544 mm
60.8 in
NIOEC6 II75 kWh
Power
490 hp
365 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,849 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePolestar4102 kWhNIOEC6 II75 kWh
Power
544 hp
406 kW
490 hp
365 kW
Torque
686 Nm
506 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.8 s
4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
2,351 kg
5,183 lb
2,292 kg
5,053 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,839 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,544 mm
60.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,849 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
231 hp/t
173 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
214 hp/t
159 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Polestar 4 102 kWh

  • Has 54 hp more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

NIO EC6 II 75 kWh

  • Has 14 Nm more
  • Is 59 kg lighter
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Polestar 4 102 kWh
NIO EC6 II 75 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

102 kWh
M50 83.9 kWh
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMWi4 (G26)M50 83.9 kWh
75 kWh
GT 98.7 kWh
VS
NIOEC6 II75 kWhvsFordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
102 kWh
90 kWh
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsLexusLF-Z Electrified Concept90 kWh
75 kWh
GTS 4.0 V8
VS
NIOEC6 II75 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
75 kWh
3.0
VS
NIOEC6 II75 kWhvsBMWM2 (G87)3.0
102 kWh
AMG GLE 63 V8
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)AMG GLE 63 V8
75 kWh
S 95 kWh
VS
NIOEC6 II75 kWhvsAUDIe-tron SportbackS 95 kWh
102 kWh
X H550 2.0L
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsLotusEletreX H550 2.0L
75 kWh
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
VS
NIOEC6 II75 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
102 kWh
M850i V8
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMW8 Series Gran Coupe (G16)M850i V8
102 kWh
M850i
VS
Polestar4102 kWhvsBMW8 Series (G15)M850i
75 kWh
AMG CLE 53
VS
NIOEC6 II75 kWhvsMercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)AMG CLE 53
Polestar 4 102 kWh vs NIO EC6 II 75 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster