BMW 5 Series Touring (E61)
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535dvsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCadillac BLS Wagon
2.8 T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
- Lightest1,630 kg3,594 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 255hp190kW |
| Torque | 560Nm413lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Gross weight | 2,315kg5,104lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 85.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 27.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 318Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 504km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,792cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,843mm191in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,802mm71in |
| Height | 1,491mm59in | 1,543mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,886mm114in | 2,675mm105in |
| Front track | 1,558mm61in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 419L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,650L | 1,273L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d: Power / Torque
- Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 27.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 272 hp 203 kW |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW |
BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d has 17 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 and BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 6.6 s |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | 255 hp 190 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d | CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 255 hp 190 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 504 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 419 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series Touring (E61) 535d
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 210 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 81 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























