BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) · Facelift 2001
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) · Facelift 2001 330xivsVolvo S40 II 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S40 II
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volvo S40 II 2.5
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,403 kg3,093 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range660 km410 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | VolvoS40 II2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,403kg3,093lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.2s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 63.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 25.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,471mm176in | 4,468mm176in |
| Width | 1,739mm68in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,640mm104in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,531mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 404L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 883L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 224g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi: Power / Torque
- Volvo S40 II 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | VolvoS40 II2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 25.6 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 220 hp 164 kW |
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi has 11 hp more than Volvo S40 II 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 and BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 1,403 kg 3,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 6.6 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi and Volvo S40 II 2.5: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S40 II 2.5 and BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 636 km 395 mi |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS40 II2.5 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoS40 II2.5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | VolvoS40 II2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,403 kg 3,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 224 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 404 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi | Volvo S40 II 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo S40 II 2.5
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 137 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























