BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) · Facelift 2001
Car comparison
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) · Facelift 2001 330xivsBMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003 330Ci
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) · Facelift 2003
330Ci
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score73/100
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range656 km408 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.2s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 91.0s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 27.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 636km395mi Calculated | 656km408mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,471mm176in | 4,455mm175in |
| Width | 1,739mm68in | 1,757mm69in |
| Height | 1,434mm56in | 1,369mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,725mm107in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,471mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,483mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 410L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 27.4 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 231 hp 172 kW |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 231 hp 172 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 6.6 s |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi and BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 636 km 395 mi |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 656 km 408 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.0 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW3 Series Sedan (E46)Facelift 2001330xi | BMW3 Series Coupe (E46)Facelift 2003330Ci | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 636 km 395 mi | 656 km 408 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi | BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E46) Facelift 2001 330xi
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW 3 Series Coupe (E46) Facelift 2003 330Ci
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 km (12 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























