BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223dvsXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026
110 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score96/100
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197hp147kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 2,795kg6,162lb |
| Gross weight | 2,210kg4,872lb | - |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.3s Calculated | 54.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,386mm173in | 5,316mm209in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,988mm78in |
| Height | 1,576mm62in | 1,785mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 3,160mm124in |
| Front track | 1,583mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,584mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 171mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 415L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,405L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.3 s | 54.9 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d | 197 hp 147 kW |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 347 hp 259 kW |
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh has 150 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223d and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh: 150 hp (112 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 2,795 kg 6,162 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d | 7.3 s |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 7.7 s |
Although XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223d and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d | 197 hp 147 kW | 7.3 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 347 hp 259 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)223d | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp 147 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 2,795 kg 6,162 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 415 L 14.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 223d
- Is 1,140 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh
- Has 150 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























