Ford S-MAX II
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026
110 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score96/100
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,766 kg3,893 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,766kg3,893lb | 2,795kg6,162lb |
| Gross weight | 2,575kg5,677lb | - |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 95.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 46.0s Calculated | 54.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,796mm189in | 5,316mm209in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,988mm78in |
| Height | 1,655mm65in | 1,785mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 3,160mm124in |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 150mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 700L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,200L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 46.0 s | 54.9 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 240 hp 179 kW |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 347 hp 259 kW |
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh has 107 hp more than Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue.
The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh: 107 hp (80 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 2,795 kg 6,162 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 8.6 s |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 347 hp 259 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb | 2,795 kg 6,162 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 700 L 24.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1,029 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh
- Has 107 hp more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























