Ford Galaxy III
Car comparison
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026
110 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score96/100
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,704 kg3,757 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 347hp259kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,704kg3,757lb | 2,795kg6,162lb |
| Gross weight | 2,620kg5,776lb | - |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 96.5s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.6s Calculated | 54.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,848mm191in | 5,316mm209in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,988mm78in |
| Height | 1,747mm69in | 1,785mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 3,160mm124in |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,339L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.6 s | 54.9 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 240 hp 179 kW |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 347 hp 259 kW |
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh has 107 hp more than Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh: 107 hp (80 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 2,795 kg 6,162 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 8.7 s |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.7 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 347 hp 259 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 347 hp 259 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb | 2,795 kg 6,162 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 163 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1,091 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh
- Has 107 hp more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























