Car comparison

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostvsXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026

110 kWh

347 hpElectricFWDAutomaticMinivan / MPV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.7 s
Most powerful
347 hp
259 kW
Highest torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Best overall score
67/100
Best performance score
54/100
Best practicality score
96/100

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

Fastest top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightest
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Best power-to-weight
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Best economy score
86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Power	240hp179kW	347hp259kW
Torque	345Nm254lb-ft	450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight	1,658kg3,655lb	2,795kg6,162lb
Gross weight	2,585kg5,699lb	-
Top speed	222 km/h 138 mph	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	98.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated	92.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.6s	7.7s
0-200 km/h	43.3s Calculated	54.9s Calculated
0-60 mph	8.1s Calculated	7.2s Calculated
Fuel consumption	7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK	-
Fuel consumption city	10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK	-
Fuel consumption highway	6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK	-
Quarter mile	16.2s Calculated	15.6s Calculated
Power-to-weight	145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated	124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated	161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	886km551mi Calculated	-
Displacement	1,999cc122cu in	-
Length	4,848mm191in	5,316mm209in
Width	1,916mm75in	1,988mm78in
Height	1,747mm69in	1,785mm70in
Wheelbase	2,849mm112in	3,160mm124in
Front track	1,606mm63in	-
Rear track	1,606mm63in	-
Ground clearance	124mm5in	-
Trunk volume	300L	-
Max trunk volume	2,339L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	7
Fuel tank	70L	-
CO2 emissions	180g/km	-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	8.1 s	7.2 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.6 s	7.7 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	43.3 s	54.9 s
Top speed	222 km/h 138 mph	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.6 s	2.4 s
330 ft 101 m	7.0 s	6.6 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.6 s	10.0 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.7 s	13.1 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.2 s	15.6 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	142 km/h 88 mph	142 km/h 88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	240 hp 179 kW
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh	347 hp 259 kW

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh has 107 hp more than Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh: 107 hp (80 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	345 Nm 254 lb-ft
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh	450 Nm 332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	1,658 kg 3,655 lb
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh	2,795 kg 6,162 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	222 km/h 138 mph
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	8.6 s
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh	7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh	124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	240 hp 179 kW	8.6 s	222 km/h 138 mph
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh	347 hp 259 kW	7.7 s	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost

Power	240 hp 179 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 222 km/h 138 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	300 L 10.6 cu ft
Length	4,848 mm 190.9 in
Height	1,747 mm 68.8 in

XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh

Power	347 hp 259 kW
0-100 km/h	7.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	-
Length	5,316 mm 209.3 in
Height	1,785 mm 70.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost

XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh

Power

240 hp

179 kW

347 hp

259 kW

Torque

345 Nm

254 lb-ft

450 Nm

332 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.6 s

7.7 s

Top speed

222 km/h

138 mph

Unrestricted

210 km/h130 mph

Restricted

200 km/h124 mph

Lightness

1,658 kg

3,655 lb

2,795 kg

6,162 lb

Fuel consumption

7.9 L/100 km

29.8 mpg US

35.8 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	300 L 10.6 cu ft
Length	4,848 mm 190.9 in
Height	1,747 mm 68.8 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	-
Length	5,316 mm 209.3 in
Height	1,785 mm 70.3 in

Range score

886 km

551 mi

CO2 score

180 g/km

Trunk score

300 L

10.6 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

145 hp/t

108 kW/t

6.9 kg/hp

124 hp/t

93 kW/t

8.1 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption	7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,074 LC/year