BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220dvsFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX · Facelift 2010
2.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,063 km660 mi
- Largest trunk468 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Most powerful203 hp151 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 203hp151kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,661kg3,662lb |
| Gross weight | 2,045kg4,508lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 107.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.7s Calculated | 46.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 1,063km660mi Calculated | 864km537mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 4,903mm193in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 2,154mm85in |
| Height | 1,555mm61in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | - |
| Front track | 1,561mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 468L | 285L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 2,000L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 127g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.7 s | 46.5 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW |
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has 13 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 13 hp (10 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 7.3 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
Although Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 1,063 km 660 mi |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 864 km 537 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 203 hp 151 kW | 8.5 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d | FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 203 hp 151 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,661 kg 3,662 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,063 km 660 mi | 864 km 537 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 127 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 468 L 16.5 cu ft | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d | Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (F45) 220d
- Is 151 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range
- Has 183 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost
- Has 13 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























