Car comparison

Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Mulsanne EWB

6.75 V8

512 hp6752 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2016-2020
VS

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

5.0 V8

510 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,875 kg
    4,134 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    272 hp/t
    203 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    264 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    721 km
    448 mi
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    296 km/h
    184 mph
  • Most powerful
    512 hp
    382 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,020 Nm
    752 lb-ft
  • Best performance score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
512hp382kW
510hp380kW
Torque
1,020Nm752lb-ft
625Nm461lb-ft
Curb weight
2,730kg6,019lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Gross weight
3,200kg7,055lb
-
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.4s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph
Calculated
46.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.5s
4.9s
0-200 km/h
15.9s
Calculated
14.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.4s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
272hp/t203kW/t123hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton
Calculated
333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
658km409mi
Calculated
721km448mi
Calculated
Displacement
6,752cc412cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
5,825mm229in
5,130mm202in
Width
1,926mm76in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,541mm61in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
3,516mm138in
3,032mm119in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,626mm64in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
446L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
96L
80L
CO2 emissions
344g/km
264g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V84,000 rpm1,750 rpm4,250 rpm
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.5 s
4.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.9 s
14.4 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
8.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.4 s
10.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.4 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
182 km/h
113 mph
189 km/h
117 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW

Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 has 2 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
625 Nm
461 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
2,730 kg
6,019 lb
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
1,875 kg
4,134 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
296 km/h
184 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V85.5 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V84.9 s

Although Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 has more power, Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8: 3.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
658 km
409 mi
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
721 km
448 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
512 hp
382 kW
5.5 s
296 km/h
184 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
510 hp
380 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,825 mm
229.3 in
Height
1,541 mm
60.7 in
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
0-100 km/h5.5 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
5.5 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8
Power
512 hp
382 kW
510 hp
380 kW
Torque
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.5 s
4.9 s
Top speed
296 km/h
184 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,730 kg
6,019 lb
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Fuel consumption
14.6 L/100 km
16.1 mpg US
19.3 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
446 L
15.8 cu ft
Length
5,825 mm
229.3 in
Height
1,541 mm
60.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
658 km
409 mi
721 km
448 mi
CO2 score
344 g/km
264 g/km
Trunk score
446 L
15.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
Consumption14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.55 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi41.12 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,833 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 395 Nm more
  • Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8

  • Is 855 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 84 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 80 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
5.0 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged
6.75 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
5.0 V8
4.2 V8 32V L Super
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L Super
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
5.0 V8
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
6.75 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
5.0 V8
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
6.75 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8vsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
5.0 V8
R 4.0 24V Sport
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 vs Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster