Bentley Mulsanne EWB
Car comparison
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 · Stage 3vsBentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 · Stage 2vsBentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 · Stage 1vsBentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Mulsanne EWB
6.75 V8 (Stage 2)
Bentley Mulsanne EWB
6.75 V8 (Stage 1)
Bentley Mulsanne EWB
6.75 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed346 km/h215 mph
- Most powerful768 hp573 kW
- Highest torque1,581 Nm1,166 lb-ft
- Lightest2,730 kg6,019 lb
- Best power-to-weight281 hp/t210 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.8 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions344 g/km
- Best estimated range658 km409 mi
- Largest trunk446 L
- Best overall score82/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score68/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 768hp573kW+256 hp | 666hp496kW+154 hp | 604hp451kW+92 hp | 512hp382kW |
| Torque | 1,581Nm1,166lb-ft+561 Nm | 1,377Nm1,016lb-ft+357 Nm | 1,244Nm918lb-ft+224 Nm | 1,020Nm752lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,730kg6,019lb | 2,730kg6,019lb | 2,730kg6,019lb | 2,730kg6,019lb |
| Gross weight | 3,200kg7,055lb | 3,200kg7,055lb | 3,200kg7,055lb | 3,200kg7,055lb |
| Top speed | 346 km/h 215 mph | 332 km/h 206 mph | 323 km/h 201 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 54.3s99% target: 343 km/h / 213 mph-12.7 s Calculated | 60.0s99% target: 329 km/h / 204 mph-7.1 s Calculated | 63.9s99% target: 320 km/h / 199 mph-3.2 s Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s-1.2 s | 4.7s-0.8 s | 5.0s-0.5 s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.6s-5.0 s Calculated | 12.0s-3.6 s Calculated | 13.1s-2.5 s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.5s-0.8 s Calculated | 4.8s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK | 22.8L/100 km10.3mpg US12.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.8s-1.6 s Calculated | 12.3s-1.0 s Calculated | 12.7s-0.7 s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 281hp/t210kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 579Nm/t387lb-ft/ton Calculated | 504Nm/t337lb-ft/ton Calculated | 456Nm/t305lb-ft/ton Calculated | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | 658km409mi Calculated | 658km409mi Calculated | 658km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,752cc412cu in | 6,752cc412cu in | 6,752cc412cu in | 6,752cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,825mm229in | 5,825mm229in | 5,825mm229in | 5,825mm229in |
| Height | 1,541mm61in | 1,541mm61in | 1,541mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 3,516mm138in | 3,516mm138in | 3,516mm138in | 3,516mm138in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,651mm65in | 1,651mm65in | 1,651mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 446L | 446L | 446L | 446L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 96L | 96L | 96L | 96L |
| CO2 emissions | 344g/km | 344g/km | 344g/km | 344g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 2) 666 hp: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 1) 604 hp: Power / Torque
- Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 512 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.5 s | 4.8 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.7 s | 5.0 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.6 s | 12.0 s | 13.1 s | 15.6 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 31.8 s | 45.5 s | 78.7 s | - |
| Top speed | 346 km/h 215 mph | 332 km/h 206 mph | 323 km/h 201 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.7 s | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s | 10.8 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.8 s | 12.3 s | 12.7 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 214 km/h 133 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 768 hp 573 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 666 hp 496 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 604 hp 451 kW |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 512 hp 382 kW |
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp has 256 hp more than Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 512 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 512 hp and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp: 256 hp (191 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 1,581 Nm 1,166 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 1,377 Nm 1,016 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 1,244 Nm 918 lb-ft |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 346 km/h 215 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 332 km/h 206 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 296 km/h 184 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 4.3 s |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 4.7 s |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 5.0 s |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 512 hp: 1.2 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 2) 666 hp and Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 1) 604 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 281 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 658 km 409 mi |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 658 km 409 mi |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 658 km 409 mi |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 658 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 768 hp 573 kW | 4.3 s | 346 km/h 215 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 666 hp 496 kW | 4.7 s | 332 km/h 206 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 604 hp 451 kW | 5.0 s | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 512 hp 382 kW | 5.5 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp |
| 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp |
| 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp |
| 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp |
| 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | 281 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
| BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 3)768 hp | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 2)666 hp | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8 (Stage 1)604 hp | BentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8512 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 768 hp 573 kW | 666 hp 496 kW | 604 hp 451 kW | 512 hp 382 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,581 Nm 1,166 lb-ft | 1,377 Nm 1,016 lb-ft | 1,244 Nm 918 lb-ft | 1,020 Nm 752 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.7 s | 5.0 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 346 km/h 215 mph | 332 km/h 206 mph | 323 km/h 201 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb | 2,730 kg 6,019 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km 16.1 mpg US 19.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | 658 km 409 mi | 658 km 409 mi | 658 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 344 g/km | 344 g/km | 344 g/km | 344 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 446 L 15.8 cu ft | 446 L 15.8 cu ft | 446 L 15.8 cu ft | 446 L 15.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 281 hp/t 210 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp | Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 2) 666 hp | Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 1) 604 hp | Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 512 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK | 14.6 L/100 km16.1 mpg US19.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.55 LC100 km | 25.55 LC100 km | 25.55 LC100 km | 25.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi | 41.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal | 2,190 L579 US gal482 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,833 LC/year | 3,833 LC/year | 3,833 LC/year | 3,833 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 3) 768 hp
- Has 102 hp more
- Has 204 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Bentley Mulsanne EWB 6.75 V8 (Stage 2) 666 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























