Car comparison

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6vsBentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 4.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac ATS Sedan

V 3.6 V6

471 hp3564 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turboSedan2016-2019
VS

Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015

4.0 V8

507 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8

  • Most powerful
    507 hp
    378 kW
  • Highest torque
    660 Nm
    487 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.9 L/100 km
    21.6 mpg US
    25.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    826 km
    513 mi
  • Largest trunk
    442 L
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    70/100

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    298 km/h
    185 mph
  • Lightest
    1,729 kg
    3,812 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    272 hp/t
    203 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
Power
471hp351kW
507hp378kW
Torque
603Nm445lb-ft
660Nm487lb-ft
Curb weight
1,729kg3,812lb
2,425kg5,346lb
Gross weight-
2,972kg6,552lb
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
295 km/h
183 mph
To 99% top speed
44.7s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph
Calculated
64.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
11.2s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.9s
Calculated
13.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
272hp/t203kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton
Calculated
272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
488km303mi
Calculated
826km513mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,564cc217cu in
3,993cc244cu in
Length
4,673mm184in
5,299mm209in
Width
1,811mm71in
1,976mm78in
Height
1,415mm56in
1,488mm59in
Wheelbase
2,775mm109in
3,066mm121in
Front track
1,538mm61in
1,643mm65in
Rear track
1,536mm60in
1,642mm65in
Trunk volume
295L
442L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
61L
90L
CO2 emissions-
254g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V65,850 rpm3,500 rpm6,500 rpm
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V86,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.2 s
14.9 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
295 km/h
183 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
11.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.9 s
13.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
207 km/h
129 mph
187 km/h
116 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
507 hp
378 kW

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 has 36 hp more than Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: 36 hp (27 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
660 Nm
487 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
1,729 kg
3,812 lb
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
2,425 kg
5,346 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
298 km/h
185 mph
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
295 km/h
183 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V64.2 s
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V85.2 s

Although Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 has more power, Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 and Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 and Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
209 hp/t
156 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
488 km
303 mi
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
826 km
513 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
471 hp
351 kW
4.2 s
298 km/h
185 mph
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
507 hp
378 kW
5.2 s
295 km/h
183 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
Power
471 hp
351 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
Power
507 hp
378 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
4.2 s
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
209 hp/t
156 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8
Power
471 hp
351 kW
507 hp
378 kW
Torque
603 Nm
445 lb-ft
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
5.2 s
Top speed
298 km/h
185 mph
295 km/h
183 mph
Lightness
1,729 kg
3,812 lb
2,425 kg
5,346 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
10.9 L/100 km
21.6 mpg US
25.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
295 L
10.4 cu ft
Length
4,673 mm
184.0 in
Height
1,415 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Length
5,299 mm
208.6 in
Height
1,488 mm
58.6 in
Range score
488 km
303 mi
826 km
513 mi
CO2 score
-
254 g/km
Trunk score
295 L
10.4 cu ft
442 L
15.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
272 hp/t
203 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
209 hp/t
156 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km19.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi30.70 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year2,861 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6

  • Is 696 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Bentley Flying Spur II Facelift 2015 4.0 V8

  • Has 36 hp more
  • Has 57 Nm more
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 338 km (210 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 147 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6
Bentley Flying Spur II 4.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

V 3.6 V6
V 3.6 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacATS CoupeV 3.6 V6
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur II4.0 V8
V 3.6 V6
CS 3.0
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsBMWM3 (F80)CS 3.0
4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8vsBentleyFlying Spur III4.0 V8
V 3.6 V6
F 5.0 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsLexusGS IVFacelift 2015F 5.0 V8
4.0 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8vsBentleyMulsanne IIFacelift 20166.75 V8
V 3.6 V6
V 6.2 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsCadillacCTS IIIV 6.2 V8
4.0 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8vsBentleyMulsanne EWB6.75 V8
V 3.6 V6
AMG C 63 V8
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 V8
4.0 V8
6.75 V8
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8vsBentleyMulsanne II6.75 V8
V 3.6 V6
S 3.0 V6
VS
CadillacATS SedanV 3.6 V6vsMaseratiGhibli III (M157)Facelift 2017S 3.0 V6
4.0 V8
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
BentleyFlying Spur IIFacelift 20154.0 V8vsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Cadillac ATS Sedan V 3.6 V6 vs Bentley Flying Spur II · Facelift 2015 4.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster