Bentley Continental GT II
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12vsBentley Continental R 6.7 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental R
6.7 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed316 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful567 hp423 kW
- Lightest2,320 kg5,115 lb
- Best power-to-weight244 hp/t182 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.4 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range621 km386 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score68/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8
- Highest torque835 Nm616 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 567hp423kW | 406hp303kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 835Nm616lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 92.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.0s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 341Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 621km386mi Calculated | 578km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 5,350mm211in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,872mm74in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 347L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 108L |
| CO2 emissions | 338g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,150 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.0 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 406 hp 303 kW |
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 has 161 hp more than Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: 161 hp (120 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 4.5 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: 1.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 621 km 386 mi |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 578 km 359 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.5 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 406 hp 303 kW | 6.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 |
| 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | BentleyContinental R6.7 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 567 hp 423 kW | 406 hp 303 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 835 Nm 616 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 18.7 L/100 km 12.6 mpg US 15.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 621 km 386 mi | 578 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 338 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 347 L 12.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 | Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK | 18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km | 32.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi | 52.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal | 2,805 L741 US gal617 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year | 4,909 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Has 161 hp more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 71 km/h (44 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 79 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 43 km (27 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Bentley Continental R 6.7 V8
- Has 135 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























