Bentley Continental GTC III
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8vsBentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II
6.0 W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.6 L/100 km14.2 mpg US17.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score75/100
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Most powerful567 hp423 kW
- Lightest2,320 kg5,115 lb
- Best power-to-weight244 hp/t182 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score75/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 567hp423kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,335kg5,148lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Gross weight | 2,800kg6,173lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.1s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 83.5s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 621km386mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,399mm55in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,664mm66in | 1,655mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 235L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 338g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 14.0 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW |
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 has 17 hp more than Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 2,335 kg 5,148 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 4.1 s |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 4.5 s |
Although Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 has more power, Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8 and Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 769 km 478 mi |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 621 km 386 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.1 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.5 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 567 hp 423 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,335 kg 5,148 lb | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 621 km 386 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 338 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8 | Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 149 km (92 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























