Car comparison

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12vsBentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015

Supersport 6.0 W12

710 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2017-2018
VS

Bentley Continental GT

6.0 W12 Twin Turbo

560 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2010

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12

  • Fastest top speed
    336 km/h
    209 mph
  • Most powerful
    710 hp
    529 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,017 Nm
    750 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,280 kg
    5,027 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    311 hp/t
    232 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    15.7 L/100 km
    15.0 mpg US
    18.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    573 km
    356 mi
  • Best economy score
    65/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Power
710hp529kW
560hp418kW
Torque
1,017Nm750lb-ft
650Nm479lb-ft
Curb weight
2,280kg5,027lb
2,385kg5,258lb
Gross weight
2,750kg6,063lb
2,800kg6,173lb
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
318 km/h
198 mph
To 99% top speed
131.5s99% target: 333 km/h / 207 mph
Calculated
91.7s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
4.8s
0-200 km/h
20.9s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
4.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
24.3L/100 km9.7mpg US11.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
311hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb
Calculated
235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
446Nm/t298lb-ft/ton
Calculated
273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
573km356mi
Calculated
526km327mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,998cc366cu in
5,998cc366cu in
Length
4,818mm190in
4,807mm189in
Width
1,944mm77in
1,918mm76in
Height
1,391mm55in
1,390mm55in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,745mm108in
Front track
1,664mm66in
1,630mm64in
Rear track
1,655mm65in
1,615mm64in
Trunk volume
358L
-
Max trunk volume-
370L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
90L
CO2 emissions
358g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin TurboPowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W125,900 rpm2,050-4,500 rpm6,150 rpm
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo6,100 rpm1,650 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
4.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
4.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.9 s
15.0 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
86.2 s
-
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
318 km/h
198 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
102 mph
184 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 has 150 hp more than Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 150 hp (112 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 has more power, Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 2.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
311 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
710 hp
529 kW
7.2 s
336 km/h
209 mph
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
560 hp
418 kW
4.8 s
318 km/h
198 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,818 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,391 mm
54.8 in
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,807 mm
189.3 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
318 km/h
198 mph
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
7.2 s
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
4.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
311 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Power
710 hp
529 kW
560 hp
418 kW
Torque
1,017 Nm
750 lb-ft
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
4.8 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
318 km/h
198 mph
Lightness
2,280 kg
5,027 lb
2,385 kg
5,258 lb
Fuel consumption
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
17.1 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,818 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,391 mm
54.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,807 mm
189.3 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Range score
573 km
356 mi
526 km
327 mi
CO2 score
358 g/km
-
Trunk score
358 L
12.6 cu ft
370 L
13.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
311 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Consumption15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.47 LC100 km29.93 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi44.22 LC100 mi48.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,121 LC/year4,489 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12

  • Has 150 hp more
  • Has 367 Nm more
  • Is 105 kg lighter
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 77 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Smallest trunk

Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo

  • Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GT II Supersport 6.0 W12
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 vs Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster