Bentley Continental GT
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin TurbovsBentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II
6.0 W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Most powerful567 hp423 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest2,320 kg5,115 lb
- Best power-to-weight244 hp/t182 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range621 km386 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score86/100
- Best economy score68/100
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 567hp423kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Gross weight | 2,800kg6,173lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.7s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 84.2s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 273Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 302Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 526km327mi Calculated | 621km386mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,807mm189in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,918mm76in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,615mm64in | 1,655mm65in |
| Max trunk volume | 370L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 338g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 14.0 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 115 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW |
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 has 7 hp more than Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo and Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 4.8 s |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 526 km 327 mi |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 621 km 386 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.8 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 567 hp 423 kW | 4.5 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo |
| 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | BentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 567 hp 423 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 17.1 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.5 mpg UK | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 526 km 327 mi | 621 km 386 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 338 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo | Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.93 LC100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 48.16 LC100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,565 L678 US gal564 UK gal | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,489 LC/year | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT 6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Bentley Continental GT II 6.0 W12
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 94 km (59 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























