Car comparison

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12vsBentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015

Supersport 6.0 W12

710 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2017-2018
VS

Bentley Continental GT III

6.0 TSI W12

635 hp5950 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Lightest
    2,244 kg
    4,947 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.1 L/100 km
    19.4 mpg US
    23.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.7 L/100 km
    14.1 mpg US
    16.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    744 km
    462 mi
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    90/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
Power
710hp529kW
635hp474kW
Torque
1,017Nm750lb-ft
900Nm664lb-ft
Curb weight
2,280kg5,027lb
2,244kg4,947lb
Gross weight
2,750kg6,063lb
2,725kg6,008lb
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
333 km/h
207 mph
To 99% top speed
131.5s99% target: 333 km/h / 207 mph
Calculated
67.8s99% target: 330 km/h / 205 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
20.9s
Calculated
10.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
24.3L/100 km9.7mpg US11.6mpg UK
16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
311hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb
Calculated
283hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
446Nm/t298lb-ft/ton
Calculated
401Nm/t268lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
573km356mi
Calculated
744km462mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,998cc366cu in
5,950cc363cu in
Length
4,818mm190in
4,850mm191in
Width
1,944mm77in
1,954mm77in
Height
1,391mm55in
1,405mm55in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,851mm112in
Front track
1,664mm66in
1,672mm66in
Rear track
1,655mm65in
1,664mm66in
Trunk volume
358L
358L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
90L
CO2 emissions
358g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12PowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W125,900 rpm2,050-4,500 rpm6,150 rpm
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W126,000 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.9 s
10.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
86.2 s
48.0 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
333 km/h
207 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
9.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
11.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
102 mph
206 km/h
128 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 has 75 hp more than Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 75 hp (56 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 has more power, Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 3.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
311 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
283 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
710 hp
529 kW
7.2 s
336 km/h
209 mph
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
635 hp
474 kW
3.7 s
333 km/h
207 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,818 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,391 mm
54.8 in
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
Power
635 hp
474 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
Power
635 hp
474 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
333 km/h
207 mph
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK

Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
7.2 s
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
311 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
283 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12BentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
635 hp
474 kW
Torque
1,017 Nm
750 lb-ft
900 Nm
664 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
3.7 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
333 km/h
207 mph
Lightness
2,280 kg
5,027 lb
2,244 kg
4,947 lb
Fuel consumption
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
12.1 L/100 km
19.4 mpg US
23.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,818 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,391 mm
54.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,405 mm
55.3 in
Range score
573 km
356 mi
744 km
462 mi
CO2 score
358 g/km
-
Trunk score
358 L
12.6 cu ft
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
311 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
283 hp/t
211 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12
Consumption15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.47 LC100 km21.18 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi44.22 LC100 mi34.08 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,121 LC/year3,176 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12

  • Has 75 hp more
  • Has 117 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12

  • Is 36 kg lighter
  • Is 3.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 171 km (106 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GT II Supersport 6.0 W12
Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 vs Bentley Continental GT III 6.0 TSI W12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster