Car comparison

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12vsFerrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015

Supersport 6.0 W12

710 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2017-2018
VS

Ferrari GTC4Lusso

6.3 V12

690 hp6262 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,790 kg
    3,946 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    385 hp/t
    287 kW/t
    2.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    15.0 L/100 km
    15.7 mpg US
    18.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    350 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    607 km
    377 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    81/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best economy score
    67/100
  • Best practicality score
    57/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
Power
710hp529kW
690hp515kW
Torque
1,017Nm750lb-ft
697Nm514lb-ft
Curb weight
2,280kg5,027lb
1,790kg3,946lb
Gross weight
2,750kg6,063lb
-
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
335 km/h
208 mph
To 99% top speed
131.5s99% target: 333 km/h / 207 mph
Calculated
52.6s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
3.4s
0-200 km/h
20.9s
Calculated
9.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
3.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
24.3L/100 km9.7mpg US11.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
11.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
311hp/t232kW/t141hp/1000 lb
Calculated
385hp/t287kW/t175hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
446Nm/t298lb-ft/ton
Calculated
389Nm/t261lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
573km356mi
Calculated
607km377mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,998cc366cu in
6,262cc382cu in
Length
4,818mm190in
4,922mm194in
Width
1,944mm77in
1,980mm78in
Height
1,391mm55in
1,383mm54in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,990mm118in
Front track
1,664mm66in
1,674mm66in
Rear track
1,655mm65in
1,668mm66in
Trunk volume
358L
450L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
91L
CO2 emissions
358g/km
350g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12PowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
  • Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W125,900 rpm2,050-4,500 rpm6,150 rpm
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V128,000 rpm5,750 rpm8,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
3.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
3.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.9 s
9.3 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
86.2 s
36.1 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
335 km/h
208 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
4.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
7.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
9.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
11.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
102 mph
219 km/h
136 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
710 hp
529 kW
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
690 hp
515 kW

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 has 20 hp more than Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
1,017 Nm
750 lb-ft
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
697 Nm
514 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
2,280 kg
5,027 lb
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
1,790 kg
3,946 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
336 km/h
209 mph
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
335 km/h
208 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W127.2 s
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V123.4 s

Although Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 has more power, Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 3.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
311 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
385 hp/t
287 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
573 km
356 mi
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
607 km
377 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
710 hp
529 kW
7.2 s
336 km/h
209 mph
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
690 hp
515 kW
3.4 s
335 km/h
208 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,818 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,391 mm
54.8 in
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
Power
690 hp
515 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
335 km/h
208 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
Power
690 hp
515 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
335 km/h
208 mph
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK

Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
7.2 s
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
3.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
311 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
385 hp/t
287 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12
Power
710 hp
529 kW
690 hp
515 kW
Torque
1,017 Nm
750 lb-ft
697 Nm
514 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
3.4 s
Top speed
336 km/h
209 mph
335 km/h
208 mph
Lightness
2,280 kg
5,027 lb
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
Fuel consumption
15.7 L/100 km
15.0 mpg US
18.0 mpg UK
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,818 mm
189.7 in
Height
1,391 mm
54.8 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
Range score
573 km
356 mi
607 km
377 mi
CO2 score
358 g/km
350 g/km
Trunk score
358 L
12.6 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
311 hp/t
232 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
385 hp/t
287 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12
Consumption15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.47 LC100 km26.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi44.22 LC100 mi42.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,121 LC/year3,938 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12

  • Is 490 kg lighter
  • Is 3.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 74 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 33 km (21 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 92 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 8 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GT II Supersport 6.0 W12
Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Supersport 6.0 W12
6.0 TSI W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12vsBentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
6.3 V12
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12vsFerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
Supersport 6.0 W12
Speed 6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12vsBentleyContinental GT IISpeed 6.0 W12
6.3 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12vsFerrariFF6.3 V12
Supersport 6.0 W12
Supersport 6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12vsBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12
6.3 V12
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12vsFerrari488 GTB3.9 V8
Supersport 6.0 W12
Speed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12vsBentleyContinental GTSpeed 6.0i W12 48V Twin Turbo
6.3 V12
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12vsFerrari488 Spider3.9 V8
Supersport 6.0 W12
6.0 TSI W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12vsBentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12
6.3 V12
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12vsFerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12
Supersport 6.0 W12
Speed 6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015Supersport 6.0 W12vsBentleyContinental GTC IISpeed 6.0 W12
6.3 V12
4.5 V8
VS
FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12vsFerrari458 Speciale4.5 V8
Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 Supersport 6.0 W12 vs Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster