Car comparison

Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48VvsBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental Flying Spur

6.0 i W12 48V

560 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2005-2013
VS

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015

GT3-R 4.0

580 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Most powerful
    580 hp
    433 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,195 kg
    4,839 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    264 hp/t
    197 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.5 L/100 km
    12.7 mpg US
    15.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48VBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
560hp418kW
580hp433kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,475kg5,456lb
2,195kg4,839lb
Gross weight
2,980kg6,570lb
2,750kg6,063lb
Top speed
312 km/h
194 mph
304 km/h
189 mph
To 99% top speed
66.2s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph
Calculated
63.1s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.2s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
14.2s
Calculated
11.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK
18.5L/100 km12.7mpg US15.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton
Calculated
319Nm/t213lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
709km440mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,998cc366cu in
3,993cc244cu in
Length
5,307mm209in
4,806mm189in
Width
1,937mm76in
1,944mm77in
Height
1,479mm58in
1,404mm55in
Wheelbase
3,065mm121in
2,746mm108in
Front track
1,623mm64in
1,664mm66in
Rear track
1,607mm63in
1,655mm65in
Trunk volume
475L
358L
Doors
4
2
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
90L
90L
CO2 emissions-
295g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48VBentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0PowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V6,100 rpm1,650 rpm6,350 rpm
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.06,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48VBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.2 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.2 s
11.7 s
Top speed
312 km/h
194 mph
304 km/h
189 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.1 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
191 km/h
118 mph
200 km/h
124 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
560 hp
418 kW
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
580 hp
433 kW

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 has 20 hp more than Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
2,475 kg
5,456 lb
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
2,195 kg
4,839 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
312 km/h
194 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
304 km/h
189 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V5.2 s
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.03.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: 1.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
226 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
560 hp
418 kW
5.2 s
312 km/h
194 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
580 hp
433 kW
3.7 s
304 km/h
189 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
312 km/h
194 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,307 mm
208.9 in
Height
1,479 mm
58.2 in
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
580 hp
433 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48VBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
560 hp
418 kW
580 hp
433 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.2 s
3.7 s
Top speed
312 km/h
194 mph
304 km/h
189 mph
Lightness
2,475 kg
5,456 lb
2,195 kg
4,839 lb
Fuel consumption
-
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
475 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
5,307 mm
208.9 in
Height
1,479 mm
58.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Range score
-
709 km
440 mi
CO2 score
-
295 g/km
Trunk score
475 L
16.8 cu ft
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
226 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
Consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi35.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,334 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 280 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
Bentley Continental GT II GT3-R 4.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.0 i W12 48V
6.0 i W12 48V
VS
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48VvsBentleyContinental GTC6.0 i W12 48V
GT3-R 4.0
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT II6.0 W12
6.0 i W12 48V
6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
VS
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48VvsBentleyContinental GT6.0 W12 Twin Turbo
GT3-R 4.0
6.0 TSI W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0vsBentleyContinental GT III6.0 TSI W12
6.0 i W12 48V
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48VvsBentleyContinental GTC II6.0 W12
GT3-R 4.0
6.0 W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
6.0 i W12 48V
V8 S 4.0
VS
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48VvsBentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015V8 S 4.0
GT3-R 4.0
6.0 TSI W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0vsBentleyContinental GTC III6.0 TSI W12
GT3-R 4.0
Speed 6.0i W12
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0vsBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
6.0 i W12 48V
6.7 i V8 Mulliner
VS
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48VvsBentleyContinental R6.7 i V8 Mulliner
GT3-R 4.0
6.8 i V8
VS
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0vsBentleyContinental T6.8 i V8
6.0 i W12 48V
6.8i V8 Biturbo
VS
BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48VvsBentleyArnage T6.8i V8 Biturbo
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V vs Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster