Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0vsBentley Continental T 6.8 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental T
6.8 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed304 km/h189 mph
- Most powerful580 hp433 kW
- Lightest2,195 kg4,839 lb
- Best power-to-weight264 hp/t197 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption18.5 L/100 km12.7 mpg US15.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk358 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score73/100
Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8
- Highest torque875 Nm645 lb-ft
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 580hp433kW | 426hp318kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 875Nm645lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,195kg4,839lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Gross weight | 2,750kg6,063lb | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.1s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph Calculated | 101.5s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.7s Calculated | 21.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.5L/100 km12.7mpg US15.3mpg UK | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 319Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 709km440mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,993cc244cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 5,222mm206in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,872mm74in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,961mm117in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,581mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 358L | 350L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 108L |
| CO2 emissions | 295g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,200 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.7 s | 21.8 s |
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 124 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 580 hp 433 kW |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 426 hp 318 kW |
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 has 154 hp more than Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8 and Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0: 154 hp (115 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 875 Nm 645 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 2,195 kg 4,839 lb |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 273 km/h 170 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 3.7 s |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8: 2.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 580 hp 433 kW | 3.7 s | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 426 hp 318 kW | 5.9 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 580 hp 433 kW | 426 hp 318 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 875 Nm 645 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 304 km/h 189 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,195 kg 4,839 lb | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 709 km 440 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 295 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
- Has 154 hp more
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 90 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 8 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8
- Has 175 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























