Car comparison

Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 6.0 W12vsBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015

6.0 W12

590 hp5998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCabriolet / convertible2015-2018
VS

Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015

GT3-R 4.0

580 hp3993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Lightest
    2,195 kg
    4,839 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    264 hp/t
    197 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.7 L/100 km
    18.5 mpg US
    22.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.5 L/100 km
    12.7 mpg US
    15.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    295 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    709 km
    440 mi
  • Largest trunk
    358 L
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    73/100
  • Best practicality score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
590hp440kW
580hp433kW
Torque
720Nm531lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,495kg5,501lb
2,195kg4,839lb
Gross weight
2,900kg6,393lb
2,750kg6,063lb
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
304 km/h
189 mph
To 99% top speed
90.4s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
62.6s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
3.7s
0-200 km/h
14.9s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
3.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.7L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK
18.5L/100 km12.7mpg US15.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.7s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
319Nm/t213lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
629km391mi
Calculated
709km440mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,998cc366cu in
3,993cc244cu in
Length
4,806mm189in
4,806mm189in
Width
1,944mm77in
1,944mm77in
Height
1,403mm55in
1,404mm55in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,746mm108in
Front track
1,664mm66in
1,664mm66in
Rear track
1,655mm65in
1,655mm65in
Trunk volume
260L
358L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
90L
90L
CO2 emissions
333g/km
295g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0PowerTorque
  • Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
  • Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W126,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.06,000 rpm1,700 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
3.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
3.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.9 s
11.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
304 km/h
189 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
7.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
9.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.7 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
200 km/h
124 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 has 10 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0.

The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 has more power, Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
14.3 L/100 km
16.4 mpg US
19.8 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
590 hp
440 kW
4.7 s
315 km/h
196 mph
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
580 hp
433 kW
3.7 s
304 km/h
189 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
Power
590 hp
440 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,403 mm
55.2 in
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
580 hp
433 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
Power
590 hp
440 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.3 L/100 km
16.4 mpg US
19.8 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
580 hp
433 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
14.3 L/100 km
16.4 mpg US
19.8 mpg UK
4.7 s
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
3.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
14.3 L/100 km
16.4 mpg US
19.8 mpg UK
BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0
Power
590 hp
440 kW
580 hp
433 kW
Torque
720 Nm
531 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
3.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
304 km/h
189 mph
Lightness
2,495 kg
5,501 lb
2,195 kg
4,839 lb
Fuel consumption
14.3 L/100 km
16.4 mpg US
19.8 mpg UK
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,403 mm
55.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,806 mm
189.2 in
Height
1,404 mm
55.3 in
Range score
629 km
391 mi
709 km
440 mi
CO2 score
333 g/km
295 g/km
Trunk score
260 L
9.2 cu ft
358 L
12.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
236 hp/t
176 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
264 hp/t
197 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
Consumption14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.03 LC100 km22.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi40.27 LC100 mi35.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,754 LC/year3,334 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0

  • Is 300 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 98 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 38 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Bentley Continental GTC II 6.0 W12
Bentley Continental GT II GT3-R 4.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 vs Bentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster