Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 6.0 W12vsBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental GT II · Facelift 2015
GT3-R 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Lightest2,195 kg4,839 lb
- Best power-to-weight264 hp/t197 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.5 L/100 km12.7 mpg US15.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions295 g/km
- Best estimated range709 km440 mi
- Largest trunk358 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful590 hp440 kW
- Highest torque720 Nm531 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 590hp440kW | 580hp433kW |
| Torque | 720Nm531lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,195kg4,839lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,750kg6,063lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.4s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 62.6s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.7L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK | 18.5L/100 km12.7mpg US15.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 319Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 629km391mi Calculated | 709km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 3,993cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 4,806mm189in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,944mm77in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,404mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,746mm108in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,664mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 358L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 333g/km | 295g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 11.6 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 304 km/h 189 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 590 hp 440 kW |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 580 hp 433 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 has 10 hp more than Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 2,195 kg 4,839 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 304 km/h 189 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 4.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 3.7 s |
Although Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 has more power, Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 629 km 391 mi |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 709 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 590 hp 440 kW | 4.7 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 580 hp 433 kW | 3.7 s | 304 km/h 189 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | BentleyContinental GT IIFacelift 2015GT3-R 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 590 hp 440 kW | 580 hp 433 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 304 km/h 189 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 2,195 kg 4,839 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 629 km 391 mi | 709 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 333 g/km | 295 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 358 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 | Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.03 LC100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,754 LC/year | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Bentley Continental GT II Facelift 2015 GT3-R 4.0
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 79 km (49 mi) more estimated range
- Has 98 L more trunk volume
- Emits 38 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























