Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC II · Facelift 2015 6.0 W12vsBentley Continental T 6.8 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental T
6.8 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful590 hp440 kW
- Best power-to-weight236 hp/t176 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption21.7 L/100 km10.8 mpg US13.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score69/100
Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8
- Highest torque875 Nm645 lb-ft
- Lightest2,450 kg5,401 lb
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 590hp440kW | 426hp318kW |
| Torque | 720Nm531lb-ft | 875Nm645lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Gross weight | 2,900kg6,393lb | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.4s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 100.6s99% target: 270 km/h / 168 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.7L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 629km391mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,998cc366cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,806mm189in | 5,222mm206in |
| Width | 1,944mm77in | 1,872mm74in |
| Height | 1,403mm55in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,746mm108in | 2,961mm117in |
| Front track | 1,664mm66in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | 1,581mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 350L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 108L |
| CO2 emissions | 333g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,200 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 590 hp 440 kW |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 426 hp 318 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 has 164 hp more than Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8 and Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12: 164 hp (122 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 875 Nm 645 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 273 km/h 170 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 4.7 s |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 and Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | 590 hp 440 kW | 4.7 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | 426 hp 318 kW | 5.9 s | 273 km/h 170 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC IIFacelift 20156.0 W12 | BentleyContinental T6.8 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 590 hp 440 kW | 426 hp 318 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 720 Nm 531 lb-ft | 875 Nm 645 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 273 km/h 170 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,495 kg 5,501 lb | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 629 km 391 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 333 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,754 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC II Facelift 2015 6.0 W12
- Has 164 hp more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 42 km/h (26 mph) higher top speed
- Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Bentley Continental T 6.8 i V8
- Has 155 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























