Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12vsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
SVR 5.0i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Lightest2,133 kg4,702 lb
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t192 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range672 km418 mi
- Largest trunk793 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Fastest top speed301 km/h187 mph
- Most powerful608 hp453 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Best performance score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 608hp453kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,133kg4,702lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.0s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 258hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 328Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 672km418mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 4,762mm187in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | - |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,670mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,689mm66in | 1,648mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,693mm67in | 1,666mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 793L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,842L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | 296g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 6,250-6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 12.5 s |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 has 58 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 58 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 2,133 kg 4,702 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 286 km/h 178 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 4.1 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 4.0 s |
Although Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 has more power, Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 258 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 649 km 403 mi |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 672 km 418 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW | 4.1 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.0 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | 258 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 2020SVR 5.0i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 608 hp 453 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb | 2,133 kg 4,702 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 672 km 418 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 296 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 793 L 28.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 258 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 58 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 SVR 5.0i V8
- Is 307 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
- Has 309 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























