Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12vsBMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X5 M (F85)
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
- Lightest2,275 kg5,016 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t188 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best estimated range766 km476 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed301 km/h187 mph
- Most powerful608 hp453 kW
- Highest torque900 Nm664 lb-ft
- Best performance score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 608hp453kW | 575hp429kW |
| Torque | 900Nm664lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,275kg5,016lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 2,970kg6,548lb |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.8s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 56.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 766km476mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,950cc363cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 4,880mm192in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,985mm78in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,754mm69in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,689mm66in | 1,666mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,693mm67in | 1,667mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 195mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,870L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 296g/km | 258g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: Power / Torque
- BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,200-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.6 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 184 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 has 33 hp more than BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 4.1 s |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 and BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 649 km 403 mi |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 766 km 476 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 608 hp 453 kW | 4.1 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga6.0 TSI W12 | BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 608 hp 453 kW | 575 hp 429 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,440 kg 5,379 lb | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 766 km 476 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 296 g/km | 258 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12 | BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.93 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,439 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 6.0 TSI W12
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 41 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 117 km (73 mi) more estimated range
- Has 166 L more trunk volume
- Emits 38 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























