Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 CLK 430vsBentley Azure 6.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Azure
6.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,755 kg3,869 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption17.7 L/100 km13.3 mpg US16.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful389 hp290 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score67/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 279hp208kW | 389hp290kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 3,030kg6,680lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 104.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 103.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.1s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK | 25.7L/100 km9.2mpg US11.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 508km316mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,266cc260cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,567mm180in | 5,342mm210in |
| Width | 1,722mm68in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,382mm54in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,505mm59in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,474mm58in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 200L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 108L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430: Power / Torque
- Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 5,750 rpm | 3,000-4,400 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.1 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 279 hp 208 kW |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 389 hp 290 kW |
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 has 110 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430 and Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: 110 hp (82 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 7.4 s |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | 279 hp 208 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 389 hp 290 kW | 6.7 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999CLK 430 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 279 hp 208 kW | 389 hp 290 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,755 kg 3,869 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 508 km 316 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 CLK 430
- Is 855 kg lighter
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Has 110 hp more
- Has 350 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























