BMW M3 Convertible (E36)
Car comparison
BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2vsBentley Azure 6.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Azure
6.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight206 hp/t153 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk230 L
- Best economy score77/100
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Most powerful389 hp290 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 321hp239kW | 389hp290kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 2,610kg5,754lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 3,030kg6,680lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 103.4s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s Calculated | 30.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 25.7L/100 km9.2mpg US11.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 206hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 559km347mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,201cc195cu in | 6,750cc412cu in |
| Length | 4,433mm175in | 5,342mm210in |
| Width | 1,710mm67in | 1,878mm74in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 3,061mm121in |
| Front track | 1,422mm56in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,444mm57in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 230L | 200L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 108L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
- Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 7,400 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 30.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 389 hp 290 kW |
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 has 68 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 and Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: 68 hp (51 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 5.6 s |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 6.7 s |
Although Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8 has more power, BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 and Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 206 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | 321 hp 239 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | 389 hp 290 kW | 6.7 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2 | BentleyAzure6.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 321 hp 239 kW | 389 hp 290 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 2,610 kg 5,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 559 km 347 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 230 L 8.1 cu ft | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 206 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
- Is 1,050 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 57 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Bentley Azure 6.7 i V8
- Has 68 hp more
- Has 400 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























