Car comparison

BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023 1.5TvsMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023

1.5T

177 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

Mitsubishi ASX II

1.3 Turbo

158 hp1333 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,345 kg
    2,965 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    117 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    814 km
    506 mi
  • Largest trunk
    536 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    177 hp
    132 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Best performance score
    43/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBAICX75Facelift 20231.5TMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
177hp132kW
158hp118kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,345kg2,965lb
Gross weight
2,095kg4,619lb
1,834kg4,043lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
91.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
76.5s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
55.7s
Calculated
63.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton
Calculated
201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
732km455mi
Calculated
814km506mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,498cc91cu in
1,333cc81cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,227mm166in
Width
1,892mm74in
1,797mm71in
Height
1,715mm68in
1,585mm62in
Wheelbase
2,800mm110in
2,639mm104in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,616mm64in
1,547mm61in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
174mm7in
Trunk volume
410L
536L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,275L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
48L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5TMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 TurboPowerTorque
  • BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo5,500 rpm1,800-3,750 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBAICX75Facelift 20231.5TMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
55.7 s
63.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
177 hp
132 kW
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
158 hp
118 kW

BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T has 19 hp more than Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
1,345 kg
2,965 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T8.6 s
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo8.5 s

Although BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T has more power, Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
732 km
455 mi
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
814 km
506 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
177 hp
132 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
158 hp
118 kW
8.5 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,715 mm
67.5 in
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,227 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
8.6 s
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBAICX75Facelift 20231.5TMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
177 hp
132 kW
158 hp
118 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,345 kg
2,965 lb
Fuel consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,715 mm
67.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,227 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Range score
732 km
455 mi
814 km
506 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
-
Trunk score
410 L
14.5 cu ft
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5TMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

  • Is 395 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 82 km (51 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 126 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BAIC X75 1.5T
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5T
GLA 200
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
1.5T
35 TFSI
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
1.3 Turbo
1.5 VGT
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
1.5T
1.6 T-GDI
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1.3 Turbo
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1.5T
40 TFSI
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
1.5T
C 1.5
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
1.5T
1.3 DIG-T
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsNissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
1.3 Turbo
1.3 DIG-T
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsNissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023 1.5T vs Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster