Car comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIvsBAIC X75 · Facelift 2023 1.5T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3)

40 TFSI

184 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2025
VS

BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023

1.5T

177 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    184 hp
    137 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    104 hp/t
    78 kW/t
    9.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.7 L/100 km
    22.0 mpg US
    26.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Lightest
    1,740 kg
    3,836 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    732 km
    455 mi
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIBAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Power
184hp137kW
177hp132kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Gross weight-
2,095kg4,619lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
107.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
91.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.1s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
48.7s
Calculated
55.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.6s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.6s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
104hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton
Calculated
172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
638km397mi
Calculated
732km455mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,485mm177in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,849mm73in
1,892mm74in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,715mm68in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,800mm110in
Front track
1,580mm62in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,616mm64in
Ground clearance-
200mm8in
Trunk volume
530L
410L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
1,550L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions-
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIBAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.6 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.1 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.7 s
55.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.6 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
184 hp
137 kW
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
177 hp
132 kW

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI has 7 hp more than BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T.

The biggest power difference is between BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
1,740 kg
3,836 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI9.1 s
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T8.6 s

Although AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI has more power, BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
104 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
638 km
397 mi
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
732 km
455 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
184 hp
137 kW
9.1 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
177 hp
132 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,485 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,715 mm
67.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
9.1 s
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
104 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIBAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Power
184 hp
137 kW
177 hp
132 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.1 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,485 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,715 mm
67.5 in
Range score
638 km
397 mi
732 km
455 mi
CO2 score
-
178 g/km
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
104 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSIBAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T

  • Is 30 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 93 km (58 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI
BAIC X75 1.5T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

40 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
1.5T
GLA 200
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200
40 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TDI
1.5T
35 TFSI
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
40 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202035 TDI
1.5T
1.6 T-GDI
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1.5T
C 1.5
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
40 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
1.5T
1.5 VGT
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
40 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ640 TFSI
1.5T
1.3 DIG-T
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsNissanQashqai III (J12)1.3 DIG-T
40 TFSI
35 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSIvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TDI
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TFSI vs BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023 1.5T - car comparison - FastVsFaster