Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSIvsBAIC X75 · Facelift 2023 1.5T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

1.5 TSI

177 hp1498 ccHybridFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023

1.5T

177 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    177 hp
    132 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    0.5 L/100 km
    470.4 mpg US
    565.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    9,000 km
    5,592 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar1.5 TSIBAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Power
177hp132kW
177hp132kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,829kg4,032lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Gross weight
2,420kg5,335lb
2,095kg4,619lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
78.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
91.7s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
40.9s
Calculated
55.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
137Nm/t91lb-ft/ton
Calculated
172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
9,000km5,592mi
Calculated
732km455mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,498cc91cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,892mm74in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,715mm68in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,800mm110in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,616mm64in
Ground clearance-
200mm8in
Trunk volume
450L
410L
Max trunk volume-
1,550L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
45L
60L
CO2 emissions-
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSIBAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5TPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
  • BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI5,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar1.5 TSIBAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.9 s
55.7 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
177 hp
132 kW
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
177 hp
132 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1,829 kg
4,032 lb
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
1,740 kg
3,836 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
215 km/h
134 mph
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI7.3 s
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T: 7.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
9,000 km
5,592 mi
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
732 km
455 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
177 hp
132 kW
7.3 s
215 km/h
134 mph
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
177 hp
132 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,715 mm
67.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
7.3 s
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar1.5 TSIBAICX75Facelift 20231.5T
Power
177 hp
132 kW
177 hp
132 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
8.6 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,829 kg
4,032 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Fuel consumption
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,715 mm
67.5 in
Range score
9,000 km
5,592 mi
732 km
455 mi
CO2 score
-
178 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 1.5 TSIBAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T
Consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km0.88 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi1.41 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used75 L20 US gal16 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost131.25 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI

  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 7.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8,268 km (5,138 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

BAIC X75 Facelift 2023 1.5T

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 89 kg lighter
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
BAIC X75 1.5T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.5T
GLA 200
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200
1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
1.5T
35 TFSI
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
1.5 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI
1.5T
1.6 T-GDI
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
1.5T
40 TFSI
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
1.5T
C 1.5
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
1.5 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5T
1.5 VGT
VS
BAICX75Facelift 20231.5TvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI vs BAIC X75 · Facelift 2023 1.5T - car comparison - FastVsFaster