Ford Mustang Mach-E
Car comparison
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWhvsAvatr 11 116 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAvatr 11
116 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Highest torque830 Nm612 lb-ft
- Lightest2,273 kg5,011 lb
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score67/100
Avatr 11 116 kWh
- Most powerful578 hp431 kW
- Best power-to-weight244 hp/t182 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Avatr11116 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487hp363kW | 578hp431kW |
| Torque | 830Nm612lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,273kg5,011lb | 2,365kg5,214lb |
| Gross weight | 2,717kg5,990lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 48.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 49.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.2s Calculated | 25.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,743mm187in | 4,880mm192in |
| Width | 1,881mm74in | 1,970mm78in |
| Height | 1,613mm64in | 1,601mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,984mm117in | 2,975mm117in |
| Front track | 1,622mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 402L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Avatr11116 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.2 s | 25.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
| Avatr11116 kWh | 578 hp 431 kW |
Avatr 11 116 kWh has 91 hp more than Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh and Avatr 11 116 kWh: 91 hp (68 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft |
| Avatr11116 kWh | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb |
| Avatr11116 kWh | 2,365 kg 5,214 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| Avatr11116 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 4.4 s |
| Avatr11116 kWh | 4.5 s |
Although Avatr 11 116 kWh has more power, Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh and Avatr 11 116 kWh: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| Avatr11116 kWh | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| Avatr11116 kWh | 578 hp 431 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Avatr11116 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Avatr11116 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp 363 kW | 578 hp 431 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 830 Nm 612 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,273 kg 5,011 lb | 2,365 kg 5,214 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 92 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
Avatr 11 116 kWh
- Has 91 hp more
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























