Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0vsAUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8J)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range984 km611 mi
- Best economy score90/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.4s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.2s Calculated | 27.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 984km611mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 4,178mm164in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,358mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 250L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.2 s | 27.1 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI has 16 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.9 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 984 km 611 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 984 km 611 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 214 km (133 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























