Car comparison

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24VvsVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000

3.2i V6 24V

250 hp3189 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2006
VS

Volkswagen Eos

3.2 V6

250 hp3168 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lightest
    1,490 kg
    3,285 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    168 hp/t
    125 kW/t
    6.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    220 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    47/100

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Highest torque
    330 Nm
    243 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.4 L/100 km
    17.6 mpg US
    21.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    598 km
    371 mi
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250hp186kW
250hp186kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
330Nm243lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight
1,875kg4,134lb
2,000kg4,409lb
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
84.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
97.4s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
24.8s
Calculated
29.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
585km363mi
Calculated
598km371mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,189cc195cu in
3,168cc193cu in
Length
4,041mm159in
4,407mm174in
Width
1,764mm69in
1,791mm71in
Height
1,346mm53in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,422mm95in
2,578mm101in
Front track
1,528mm60in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,513mm60in
1,553mm61in
Trunk volume
220L
205L
Max trunk volume
490L
380L
Doors
3
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
62L
55L
CO2 emissions
254g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24VVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6PowerTorque
  • AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V6,300 rpm2,800-3,200 rpm6,550 rpm
VolkswagenEos3.2 V66,250 rpm2,750 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.8 s
29.0 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
250 km/h
155 mph
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
247 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V6.5 s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V67.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V and Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 and AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
585 km
363 mi
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
598 km
371 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
250 hp
186 kW
6.5 s
250 km/h
155 mph
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
250 hp
186 kW
7.3 s
247 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,346 mm
53.0 in
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VVolkswagenEos3.2 V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.3 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,041 mm
159.1 in
Height
1,346 mm
53.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
4,407 mm
173.5 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
585 km
363 mi
598 km
371 mi
CO2 score
254 g/km
-
Trunk score
220 L
7.8 cu ft
205 L
7.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
168 hp/t
125 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24VVolkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.55 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi29.85 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,783 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI TT Coupe (8N) Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V

  • Is 49 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) 3.2i V6 24V
Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.2i V6 24V
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)3.2i V6 24V
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenEosFacelift 20102.0 TSI
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)2.0 TFSI
3.2 V6
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsVolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI
3.2i V6 24V
1.8 T
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8N)1.8 T
3.2 V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsAlfa RomeoBrera3.2 JTS V6
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITTS Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
3.2i V6 24V
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
3.2 V6
2.7
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsPorscheCayman (987C)2.7
3.2i V6 24V
3.2i V6 24V
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Roadster (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24V
3.2 V6
1.3 Wankel
VS
VolkswagenEos3.2 V6vsMazdaRX-81.3 Wankel
3.2i V6 24V
45 TFSI
VS
AUDITT Coupe (8N)Facelift 20003.2i V6 24VvsAUDITT Coupe (8S)Facelift 201845 TFSI
AUDI TT Coupe (8N) · Facelift 2000 3.2i V6 24V vs Volkswagen Eos 3.2 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster