Car comparison

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIvsBuick Envision II Plus 552T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 III (GU)

2.0 TFSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Buick Envision II

Plus 552T

211 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph Unrestricted
    226 km/h
    140 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    340 Nm
    251 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Buick Envision II Plus 552T

  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    932 km
    579 mi

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIBuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
Power
204hp152kW
211hp157kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,835kg4,045lb
1,760kg3,880lb
Gross weight
2,460kg5,423lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
107.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
84.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
37.4s
Calculated
65.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
153Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
890km553mi
Calculated
932km579mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
-
Length
4,717mm186in
4,845mm191in
Width
1,900mm75in
1,883mm74in
Height
1,662mm65in
1,695mm67in
Wheelbase
2,820mm111in
2,833mm112in
Front track
1,645mm65in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,637mm64in
1,612mm63in
Trunk volume
520L
515L
Max trunk volume
1,473L
1,712L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
65L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIBuick Envision II Plus 552TPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Buick Envision II Plus 552T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI4,300-6,000 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T5,500 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIBuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.4 s
65.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
144 km/h
89 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
204 hp
152 kW
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
211 hp
157 kW

Buick Envision II Plus 552T has 7 hp more than AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and Buick Envision II Plus 552T: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI8.6 s
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T8.6 s

Although Buick Envision II Plus 552T has more power, AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
890 km
553 mi
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
932 km
579 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
204 hp
152 kW
8.6 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
211 hp
157 kW
8.6 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,717 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,845 mm
190.7 in
Height
1,695 mm
66.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
8.6 s
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSIBuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
Power
204 hp
152 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
226 km/h140 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,717 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,845 mm
190.7 in
Height
1,695 mm
66.7 in
Range score
890 km
553 mi
932 km
579 mi
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIBuick Envision II Plus 552T
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Buick Envision II Plus 552T

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 41 km (26 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
Buick Envision II Plus 552T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI vs Buick Envision II Plus 552T - car comparison - FastVsFaster