Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsBuick Envision II Plus 552T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

200 hp3283 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Buick Envision II

Plus 552T

211 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2021-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    212 km/h
    132 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,184 km
    736 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Buick Envision II Plus 552T

  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    515 L
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DBuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
Power
200hp149kW
211hp157kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,905kg4,200lb
1,760kg3,880lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
84.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
44.1s
Calculated
65.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
153Nm/t103lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,184km736mi
Calculated
932km579mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
-
Length
4,745mm187in
4,845mm191in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,883mm74in
Height
1,687mm66in
1,695mm67in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,833mm112in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,612mm63in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
-
Trunk volume
477L
515L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,712L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
58L
68L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DBuick Envision II Plus 552TPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Buick Envision II Plus 552T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,000-4,200 rpm1,400-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T5,500 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DBuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
44.1 s
65.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
211 hp
157 kW

Buick Envision II Plus 552T has 11 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Buick Envision II Plus 552T: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T8.6 s

Although Buick Envision II Plus 552T has more power, Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Buick Envision II Plus 552T: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Buick Envision II Plus 552T: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,184 km
736 mi
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
932 km
579 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
211 hp
157 kW
8.6 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,845 mm
190.7 in
Height
1,695 mm
66.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DBuickEnvision IIPlus 552T
Power
200 hp
149 kW
211 hp
157 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,845 mm
190.7 in
Height
1,695 mm
66.7 in
Range score
1,184 km
736 mi
932 km
579 mi
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
515 L
18.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DBuick Envision II Plus 552T
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 180 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 252 km (157 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Buick Envision II Plus 552T

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Is 145 kg lighter
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 38 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Buick Envision II Plus 552T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Plus 552T
25T
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552TvsCadillacGT425T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Plus 552T
2.0d
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552TvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
Plus 552T
380TSI
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552TvsVolkswagenTavendor380TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
Plus 552T
40 TFSI
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552TvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI
Plus 552T
40 TFSI
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552TvsAUDIQ640 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Plus 552T
1.6T
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552TvsHyundaiKona II1.6T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Plus 552T
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
BuickEnvision IIPlus 552TvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Buick Envision II Plus 552T - car comparison - FastVsFaster