Car comparison

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSIvsMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 I (8R)

2.0 TFSI

211 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2008-2011
VS

Mitsubishi Outlander I

2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

202 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2004-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    211 hp
    157 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.4 L/100 km
    22.6 mpg US
    27.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    882 km
    548 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
211hp157kW
202hp151kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
303Nm223lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,595kg3,516lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
2,070kg4,564lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
81.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
84.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
36.0s
Calculated
39.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
882km548mi
Calculated
600km373mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,629mm182in
4,550mm179in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,750mm69in
Height
1,653mm65in
1,620mm64in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,625mm103in
Front track
1,617mm64in
1,495mm59in
Rear track
1,613mm64in
1,495mm59in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
-
Trunk volume
540L
402L
Max trunk volume
1,560L
1,705L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSIMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD TurboPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI5,500 rpm1,500-4,200 rpm5,750 rpm
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo5,500 rpm3,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.0 s
39.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
211 hp
157 kW
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI has 9 hp more than Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
303 Nm
223 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
1,595 kg
3,516 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
222 km/h
138 mph
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI7.2 s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
882 km
548 mi
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
600 km
373 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
211 hp
157 kW
7.2 s
222 km/h
138 mph
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
202 hp
151 kW
7.7 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,629 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,653 mm
65.1 in
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
Power
211 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
202 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.2 s
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIMitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Power
211 hp
157 kW
202 hp
151 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
303 Nm
223 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.7 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
Fuel consumption
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,629 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,653 mm
65.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,550 mm
179.1 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Range score
882 km
548 mi
600 km
373 mi
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSIMitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.88 LC100 km17.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.94 LC100 mi28.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,231 LC/year2,625 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Has 47 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 282 km (175 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 138 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo

  • Is 145 kg lighter
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI Hybrid
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI Hybrid
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
3.0d
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsBMWX3 (E83)3.0d
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 FSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI
2.0 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.5 i 16V Turbo
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSubaruForester II2.5 i 16V Turbo
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo
2.0 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiOutlander I2.0 i 16V 4WD TurbovsSeatAltea FreetrackFacelift 20092.0 TFSI
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI vs Mitsubishi Outlander I 2.0 i 16V 4WD Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster