Car comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSIvsSkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q3 II (F3)

45 TFSI

230 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

RS 2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    233 km/h
    145 mph
  • Lightest
    1,620 kg
    3,571 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    167 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSISkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
230hp172kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,620kg3,571lb
1,941kg4,279lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,529kg5,575lb
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
71.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
81.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
26.7s
Calculated
36.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
789km491mi
Calculated
938km583mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,484mm177in
4,699mm185in
Width
1,856mm73in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,616mm64in
1,685mm66in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,789mm110in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,579mm62in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,567mm62in
Ground clearance-
197mm8in
Trunk volume
530L
230L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions
173g/km
167g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSISkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDIPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI5,000-6,700 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,950 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSISkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.7 s
36.9 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
150 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
230 hp
172 kW
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI has 10 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
1,941 kg
4,279 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
233 km/h
145 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI6.3 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI7.0 s

Although Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI has more power, AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI and Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
789 km
491 mi
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
230 hp
172 kW
6.3 s
233 km/h
145 mph
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
7.0 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
6.3 s
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSISkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
7.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
1,941 kg
4,279 lb
Fuel consumption
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
4,484 mm
176.5 in
Height
1,616 mm
63.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,699 mm
185.0 in
Height
1,685 mm
66.3 in
Range score
789 km
491 mi
938 km
583 mi
CO2 score
173 g/km
167 g/km
Trunk score
530 L
18.7 cu ft
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSISkoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.30 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.40 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,995 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI

  • Is 321 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 300 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI
Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D240
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
25d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsJaguarF-Pace25d
45 TFSI
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
300
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
45 TFSI
45 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI V6
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
45 TFSI
40 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ240 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
45 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
RS 2.0 BiTDI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IRS 2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 45 TFSI vs Skoda Kodiaq I RS 2.0 BiTDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster